🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.