🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to remove Black history and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.